Jacques v. State
This text of 414 So. 2d 598 (Jacques v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellants’ motion to suppress. However, we conclude that it was error for the trial court to impose a single general term of probation upon each appellant for three offenses. Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977); Pearson v. State, 371 So.2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Price v. State, 393 So.2d 69 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
[599]*599Accordingly, this cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to enter separate probation orders for each offense committed by each appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
414 So. 2d 598, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacques-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.