Jacques v. State
414 So. 2d 598, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20087
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1982·No. No. AH-238, AH-262·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellants’ motion to suppress. However, we conclude that it was error for the trial court to impose a single general term of probation upon each appellant for three offenses. Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977); Pearson v. State, 371 So.2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Price v. State, 393 So.2d 69 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
[599] Accordingly, this cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to enter separate probation orders for each offense committed by each appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacques v. State, 414 So. 2d 598, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20087 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
414 So. 2d 598 (Jacques v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ward v. State
429 So. 2d 825 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)