JACQUELINE MCMURTRY and Case No. 2:23-cv-00869-DMG-PVCx CHARLEY C. MCMURTRY SR.,, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE Plaintiffs, ORDER v. JAMES FARNER, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant. Plaintiffs Jacqueline McMurtry and Charley McMurtry Sr., and Defendant Sergeant James Farner, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special Protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the Protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends to the information or items entitled to confidential treatment under applicable legal principles and as called for in this stipulation by the Parties. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal and that L.R. 79-5, set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. Defendant Sergeant James Farner may be producing documents concerning the confidential internal policies of employer, State of California, acting by and through the California Highway Patrol (CHP), which documents are generally unavailable to the public. The disclosure of this information may jeopardize the security of CHP’s operations, and jeopardize the safety of peace officers. Defendant may also be producing documents that contain personal and confidential information regarding individuals, which information is generally unavailable to the public, including records related to third parties and peace officer personnel records. The disclosure of this information to the public may violate those individuals' privacy rights. Defendant may also be producing video, audio and still photo images related to the incident at issue in this case which is generally unavailable to the public. Additionally, Defendant may be producing investigation reports, which are generally unavailable to the public, the disclosure of which could violate individuals' privacy rights and jeopardize the safety of officers. Also, documents to be produced pursuant to subpoena will likely include autopsy photographs. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. Further, at the time of this Stipulation, an investigation into the incident at issue in this case, is being conducted by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, as well as a review by the San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office as to whether any criminal charges will be levied. Both entities have advocated for the non-disclosure of any and all documents and information pertaining to the investigation and review until after any decision is made by the San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office as to whether criminal charges will be brought against any officer of the CHP. This position is taken in order to preserve the confidentiality of police investigative files as provided for under Fed. R. Evid. 501, Cal. Evid. Code § 1040(b)(2), and Cty. of Orange v. Superior Court (2000) 79 Cal. App. 4th 759, 765, and to ensure the integrity and impartiality of the investigation and the review by the District Attorney which is in the public interest. In accordance therewith, and in order to comply with discovery obligations in this case, the parties stipulate that any and all documents and information included within the investigation and review will be marked and deemed “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY.” The parties stipulate that any such designations may be revisited after the review and final determination is made by the San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office. EXCEPT, inclusion of any document within the investigation and review shall not make that document confidential if the original nature and/or source of that document was non- confidential. FURTHER, the designation of any document as confidential (or other similar label) does not exempt it from disclosure under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: Jacqueline McMurtry and Charley C. McMurtry Sr. v. James Farner, United States District Court, Central District of California, case number 2:23-cv-00869-DMG-PVC. 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items: information, regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained, or tangible things that qualify for Protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.4 “CONFIDENTIAL -ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY” Information or Items: information, regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained, or tangible things included within and are part of the investigation conducted by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Office into the incident at issue in this civil case, and which are or have been provided to the San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office for review and determination as to whether any criminal charges will be levied concerning the incident at issue in this civil case, as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.5 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel, as well as their support staff. 2.6 Designating Party: Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as "CONFIDENTIAL" OR "CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY," 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things, that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to thi
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
JACQUELINE MCMURTRY and Case No. 2:23-cv-00869-DMG-PVCx CHARLEY C. MCMURTRY SR.,, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE Plaintiffs, ORDER v. JAMES FARNER, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant. Plaintiffs Jacqueline McMurtry and Charley McMurtry Sr., and Defendant Sergeant James Farner, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special Protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the Protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends to the information or items entitled to confidential treatment under applicable legal principles and as called for in this stipulation by the Parties. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal and that L.R. 79-5, set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. Defendant Sergeant James Farner may be producing documents concerning the confidential internal policies of employer, State of California, acting by and through the California Highway Patrol (CHP), which documents are generally unavailable to the public. The disclosure of this information may jeopardize the security of CHP’s operations, and jeopardize the safety of peace officers. Defendant may also be producing documents that contain personal and confidential information regarding individuals, which information is generally unavailable to the public, including records related to third parties and peace officer personnel records. The disclosure of this information to the public may violate those individuals' privacy rights. Defendant may also be producing video, audio and still photo images related to the incident at issue in this case which is generally unavailable to the public. Additionally, Defendant may be producing investigation reports, which are generally unavailable to the public, the disclosure of which could violate individuals' privacy rights and jeopardize the safety of officers. Also, documents to be produced pursuant to subpoena will likely include autopsy photographs. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. Further, at the time of this Stipulation, an investigation into the incident at issue in this case, is being conducted by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, as well as a review by the San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office as to whether any criminal charges will be levied. Both entities have advocated for the non-disclosure of any and all documents and information pertaining to the investigation and review until after any decision is made by the San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office as to whether criminal charges will be brought against any officer of the CHP. This position is taken in order to preserve the confidentiality of police investigative files as provided for under Fed. R. Evid. 501, Cal. Evid. Code § 1040(b)(2), and Cty. of Orange v. Superior Court (2000) 79 Cal. App. 4th 759, 765, and to ensure the integrity and impartiality of the investigation and the review by the District Attorney which is in the public interest. In accordance therewith, and in order to comply with discovery obligations in this case, the parties stipulate that any and all documents and information included within the investigation and review will be marked and deemed “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY.” The parties stipulate that any such designations may be revisited after the review and final determination is made by the San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office. EXCEPT, inclusion of any document within the investigation and review shall not make that document confidential if the original nature and/or source of that document was non- confidential. FURTHER, the designation of any document as confidential (or other similar label) does not exempt it from disclosure under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: Jacqueline McMurtry and Charley C. McMurtry Sr. v. James Farner, United States District Court, Central District of California, case number 2:23-cv-00869-DMG-PVC. 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items: information, regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained, or tangible things that qualify for Protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.4 “CONFIDENTIAL -ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY” Information or Items: information, regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained, or tangible things included within and are part of the investigation conducted by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Office into the incident at issue in this civil case, and which are or have been provided to the San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office for review and determination as to whether any criminal charges will be levied concerning the incident at issue in this civil case, as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.5 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel, as well as their support staff. 2.6 Designating Party: Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as "CONFIDENTIAL" OR "CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY," 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things, that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party and includes support staff. 2.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record, and their support staff. 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services, e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium, and their employees and subcontractors. 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY.” 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material, as defined above, but also: (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. At trial, Protected Material will lose its protection, except as ordered by the Court. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of: (l) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for Protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for Protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents items, or communications for which Protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the scope of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose, e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties may expose the Designating Party to sanctions. If it comes to a Designating Party's attention that information or items that it designated for Protection do not qualify for Protection that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation. 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for Protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: (a) For information in documentary form, e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” (CONFIDENTIAL legend) and/or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” (CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY legend) to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for Protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s), e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins, A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection need not designate them for Protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents, it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for Protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL legend” and/or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY legend” to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for Protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s), e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins. (b) For testimony given in depositions, that the Designating Party identify the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of the deposition all protected testimony. (c) For information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.” If only a portion or portions of the information warrants protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s). 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party's right to secure Protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court's scheduling timeline. 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process under L.R. 37.1 et seq. 6.3 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges and those made for an improper purpose, e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of Protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party's designation until the Court rules on the challenge. 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this Action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below; FINAL Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL -ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY" Information or Items. Unless otherwise modified by the parties in writing or ordered by the Court, a Receiving Party may not disclose any item or information designated “CONFIDENTIAL -ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY,” to anyone other than: (a) The Receiving Party's counsel of record in this Action, as well as employees of such counsel of record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this Action. If disclosure to counsel of record's agents or employees occurs, counsel of record shall maintain a list of those agents or employees to whom such disclosure is made and ensure that such persons have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Ex. A); (b) The Court and its personnel under seal. 7.3 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: (a) The Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this Action. (b) The officers, directors, agents and employees, including House Counsel, of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action. (c) Experts, as defined in this Order, of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action, and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Ex. A). (d) The Court and its personnel. (e) Court reporters and their staff. (f) Professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Ex. A). (g) The author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. (h) During their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing party requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit 1 hereto; and (2) they will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Ex. A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the Court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material may be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order. (i) Any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions. 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as "CONFIDENTIAL," that Party must: (a) Promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order. (b) Promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. The notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order. (c) Cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the Court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party's permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking Protection in that Court of its confidential material, and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey a lawful directive from any court. 9. A NON-PARTY'S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non- Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY." The information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a Non-Party's confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party's confidential information, then the Party shall: (1) Promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non- Party. (2) Promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the information requested. (3) Make the information requested available for inspection by the Non- Party, if requested. (c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this Court within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the Non- Party's confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the Court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking Protection in this Court of its Protected Material. 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately: (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE When a Producing Party gives notice to a Receiving Party that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other Protection, Receiving Party shall immediately return to the Designating Party all copies of the document or material which they distributed or disclosed, and prevent the further disclosure or dissemination of the document or material. Further, if the Receiving Party discovers an inadvertent disclosure of privileged or otherwise protected information, Receiving Party shall immediately bring such inadvertent disclosure to the attention of the Designating Party and shall endeavor in good faith to obtain and return to the Designating Party all copies of the document or material which they distributed or disclosed, and to prevent the further disclosure of the document or material. This Protective Order does not affect the parties' rights or responsibilities under California law regarding the inadvertent disclosure of privileged information. See, e.g. Rico v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp., 42 Cal. 4th 807 (2007); State Comp. Ins. Fund v. WPS, Inc., 70 Cal. App. 4th 644 (1999). If Confidential Information is disclosed to any person other than in the manner authorized by this Protective Order, the party or non-designating party responsible for the disclosure, including, without limitation, all employees, officers, directors, agents and attorneys of such party or non-party, shall immediately bring such disclosure to the attention of the Designating Party. Without prejudice to other rights and remedies of the producing party, the disclosing party shall make every effort to obtain the return of the Confidential Information and to prevent the further disclosure on its own part or on the part of the person who was the unauthorized recipient of such Confidential Information. 12. MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. 12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with L.R 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party's request to file Protected Material under seal is denied by the Court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the Court. 13. FINAL DISPOSITION After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in this subdivision, "all Protected Material" includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party, by the 60-day deadline that: (1) identifies by category, where appropriate, all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed, and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4; DURATION. 14. VIOLATION OF ORDER Any violation of this Order may be punished by any and all appropriate measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary sanctions. GOOD CAUSE BEING SHOWN BY THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, ITIS SO ORDERED. . fo Vi Dated: July 6, 2023 HON. PEDRO V. CASTILLO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 2:23-cv-00869-DMG-PVC
I, ______________________________________[print or type full name], of _________________________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, and the State of California that I have read in its entirety and understand the STIPULATION RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER that was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on _____________ in the case of McMurtry, et al. v. Farner, United States District Court Case No. 2:23-cv-00869-DMG-PVC. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this STIPULATION RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER, and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this STIPULATION RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this STIPULATION RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of _______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this STIPULATION RE: Date: ______________________________________ City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ Printed name: _______________________________ Signature: _________________________________
LA2023601387/66065222.docx