Jacobsen v. West

13 Vet. App. 35, 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1037, 1999 WL 740858
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided September 23, 1999·No. No. 97-309·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On August 26, 1999, in a per curiam order, the Court granted in part the appellant’s application for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Pursuant to the Court’s Internal Operating Procedures (IOP) at V.(a)(3), a judge requested en banc consideration.

On consideration of the foregoing, and it appearing that there is no majority in favor of the request for en banc consideration, it is

ORDERED that en banc consideration is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacobsen v. West, 13 Vet. App. 35, 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1037, 1999 WL 740858 (Cal. 1999).

13 Vet. App. 35 (Jacobsen v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Briddell v. Principi
16 Vet. App. 267 (Veterans Claims, 2002)
Cullens v. Gober
14 Vet. App. 234 (Veterans Claims, 2001)
Hudson v. West
13 Vet. App. 470 (Veterans Claims, 2000)