Jacobs v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

137 A.3d 1260, 635 Pa. 449, 2016 WL 2658606, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 983
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 10, 2016
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 137 A.3d 1260 (Jacobs v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacobs v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 137 A.3d 1260, 635 Pa. 449, 2016 WL 2658606, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 983 (Pa. 2016).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of May 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. Because the Commonwealth Court substituted its own assessments. of the evidence and the. credibility of the witnesses for that of the Unemployment Compensation Review Board’s (“UCBR”), the judgment, of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED, and the determination of the UCBR is reinstated. See Peak v. UCBR, 509 Pa. 267, 501 A.2d 1383 (1985) (holding that the UCBR is “the ultimate finder of fact” and it is not an-appellate court’s function to balance the evidence; questions of credibility, and the resolution of evidentiary conflicts are not subject to reevaluation upon appellate review).

Chief Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement in which Justice 'DOUGHERTY joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peters, J., Aplt. v. WCAB (Cintas Corp)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2021
J. Peters v. WCAB (Cintas Corp.)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 A.3d 1260, 635 Pa. 449, 2016 WL 2658606, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-unemployment-compensation-board-of-review-pa-2016.