Jacobs v. State
785 So. 2d 713, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7160, 2001 WL 543178
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 23, 2001·No. No. 4D00-2180·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Gray v. State, 780 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(rejecting claim that under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), habitual offender sentence is unconstitutional — “Apprendi does not apply to enhanced sentences based on prior conviction.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jacobs v. State, 785 So. 2d 713, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7160, 2001 WL 543178 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
785 So. 2d 713 (Jacobs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. State
790 So. 2d 1200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Preston v. State
785 So. 2d 713 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)