Jacobs v. State
785 So. 2d 713, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7160, 2001 WL 543178
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-2180
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 785 So. 2d 713 (Jacobs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jacobs v. State, 785 So. 2d 713, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7160, 2001 WL 543178 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Gray v. State, 780 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(rejecting claim that under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), habitual offender sentence is unconstitutional — “Apprendi does not apply to enhanced sentences based on prior conviction.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Walker v. State
790 So. 2d 1200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Preston v. State
785 So. 2d 713 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
785 So. 2d 713, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7160, 2001 WL 543178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacobs-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.