Jacob Nathaniel Fisher v. Don W. Thompson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 8, 2019
DocketA19A0825
StatusPublished

This text of Jacob Nathaniel Fisher v. Don W. Thompson (Jacob Nathaniel Fisher v. Don W. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacob Nathaniel Fisher v. Don W. Thompson, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 20, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0825. JACOB NATHANIEL FISHER v. DON W. THOMPSON.

Prison inmate Jacob Nathaniel Fisher filed an original mandamus action in this Court against former Superior Court Judge Don W. Thompson. Fisher requests that this Court compel the superior court to vacate, set aside, and dismiss with prejudice his convictions and sentences.1 “Generally, the superior courts of this state have the power, in proper cases, to issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo warranto, and injunction, and hence the need to resort to the appellate courts for such relief by petition filed in the appellate courts will be extremely rare.” Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436, 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983). And an appellate court has limited original mandamus authority in aid of its jurisdiction. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. IV. Mandamus will issue “only if (1) no other adequate legal remedy is available to effectuate the relief sought; and (2) the applicant has a clear legal right to such relief.” Bibb County v. Monroe County, 294 Ga. 730, 734 (2) (755 SE2d 760) (2014). This is not one of the extremely rare instances in which this Court will exercise original mandamus jurisdiction. See Gay v. Owens, 292 Ga. 480, 482-483 (2) (738 SE2d 614) (2013). Fisher seeks to challenge his convictions through his mandamus action, but “a petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy

1 From the limited materials submitted with the appeal, it appears that the superior court issued an order denying Fisher’s mandamus action filed therein. But Fisher has failed to include the trial court’s order with the materials he submitted. in a criminal case,” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009), and any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed, see id. at 218 (2); see also Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). For these reasons, Fisher’s action is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/20/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. State
686 S.E.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Brown v. Johnson
306 S.E.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)
Roberts v. State
690 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Bibb County v. Monroe County
755 S.E.2d 760 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014)
Gay v. Owens
738 S.E.2d 614 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jacob Nathaniel Fisher v. Don W. Thompson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacob-nathaniel-fisher-v-don-w-thompson-gactapp-2019.