Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad

186 Ill. App. 531

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided May 1, 1914·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Harris

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Attorney and client, § 134*—upon whom notice for attorney’s lien must he served. Section 55, ch. 83, Hurd’s R. S. J. & A. ¶ 611, providing that notice for attorney’s lien shall be -served upon the party against whom the attorney’s client may have suit, means that the notice must be personally served on the party against whom summons would issue, and the personal service of such notice should follow the law as to service of process where the party is a corporation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Harris

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Attorney and client, § 134*—upon whom notice for attorney’s lien must he served. Section 55, ch. 83, Hurd’s R. S. J. & A. ¶ 611, providing that notice for attorney’s lien shall be -served upon the party against whom the attorney’s client may have suit, means that the notice must be personally served on the party against whom summons would issue, and the personal service of such notice should follow the law as to service of process where the party is a corporation.

Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad, 186 Ill. App. 531 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

186 Ill. App. 531 (Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related