Home/Appellate Court of Illinois/Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad

Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad

186 Ill. App. 531
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMay 1, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 186 Ill. App. 531 (Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad, 186 Ill. App. 531 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Harris

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Attorney and client, § 134*—upon whom notice for attorney’s lien must he served. Section 55, ch. 83, Hurd’s R. S. J. & A. ¶ 611, providing that notice for attorney’s lien shall be -served upon the party against whom the attorney’s client may have suit, means that the notice must be personally served on the party against whom summons would issue, and the personal service of such notice should follow the law as to service of process where the party is a corporation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cazalet v. Cazalet
54 N.E.2d 61 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1944)
Mayer v. Yellow Cab Co.
247 Ill. App. 42 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)
Moore v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
245 Ill. App. 8 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)
Reynolds v. Alton, Granite & St. Louis Traction Co.
211 Ill. App. 158 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 Ill. App. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-toledo-st-louis-western-railroad-illappct-1914.