Jackson v. State

111 S.E. 750, 28 Ga. App. 442
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 11, 1922·No. 13214·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. There is ample evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere. -Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 111 S.E. 750, 28 Ga. App. 442 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 750 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sims v. State
67 S.E.2d 254 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)