Jackson v. State

107 S.E. 167, 26 Ga. App. 630, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 565

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Ga. App. 324 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1921·No. 12134·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching in its character, and is not such evidence as would probably produce a different result upon another trial of the case.

[631]*631Decided April 13, 1921.

Indictment for possessing liquor; from Randolph superior court — Judge Worrill. November 29, 1920.

Charles W. Worrill, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold, contra.

2. JSTo error of law was committed upon the trial; the evidence supports the verdict, and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Mike, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching in its character, and is not such evidence as would probably produce a different result upon another trial of the case.

[631]*631Decided April 13, 1921.

Indictment for possessing liquor; from Randolph superior court — Judge Worrill. November 29, 1920.

Charles W. Worrill, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold, contra.

2. JSTo error of law was committed upon the trial; the evidence supports the verdict, and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Mike, J., concur.

Jackson v. State, 107 S.E. 167, 26 Ga. App. 630, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 565 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

107 S.E. 167 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.