Jackson v. State
This text of 119 S.E. 525 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict.
2. The question as to the admissibility of the evidence which the movant contends was obtained by illegal search and seizure, and therefore objectionable as being in violation of certain provisions of the State and Federal constitutions, has been settled by rulings of this court. See the cases of Kennemer v. State, 154 Ga. 139 (113 S. E. 551); Calhoun v. State, 144 Ga. 679 (87 S. E. 893), and cases there cited.
3. The request to review the cases of Kennemer v. State and Calhoun v. State, supra, was granted; but upon review this court declines to overrule those cases. Lester v. State, 155 Ga. 882 (118 S. E. 674).
Judment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 S.E. 525, 156 Ga. 647, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-ga-1923.