Jackson v. State

36 So. 3d 873, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7721, 2010 WL 2218645
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 975 So. 2d 485
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 4, 2010·No. No. 5D10-1343·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, Appellant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). When the trial court considered the motion, it believed that an appeal of a prior rule 3.800(a) motion, involving issues that were “sufficiently related to divest the trial court of jurisdiction,” was pending in this court. In fact, we had ruled on and issued the mandate before the trial court dismissed the instant motion. Therefore, the trial court should have considered the instant motion on its merits. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the trial court for that purpose.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 36 So. 3d 873, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7721, 2010 WL 2218645 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

36 So. 3d 873 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.