Jackson v. State
958 So. 2d 1105, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532, 2007 WL 1758505
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 880 So. 2d 1241 →
Opinion
We affirm the order denying appellant’s motion for postconviction DNA testing as being legally insufficient. Appellant in fact alleges that DNA testing was done but that the results were negative and not shown to the jury. His motion appears to go more to a potential claim for postconviction relief under Rule 3.850, yet it is untimely for that relief. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. State, 958 So. 2d 1105, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532, 2007 WL 1758505 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
958 So. 2d 1105 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.