Jackson v. State

925 So. 2d 1134, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5822, 2006 WL 1098272

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Ezra Jackson appeals the denial of his petition for declaratory judgment¹ on the ground that he does not qualify for sexual predator designation. He filed this petition in a Hillsborough County court despite the fact that the designation was imposed by a court in Pinellas County. We affirm without prejudice to any right Mr. Jackson might have to file a motion challenging this designation in the court that imposed it.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, NORTHCUTT, and CANADY, JJ„ Concur.

1 . We note that this court has recently held that a challenge to a sexual predator designation may be brought in a postconviction motion. King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).