Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State

870 So. 2d 135, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19785, 2003 WL 23094600
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 2003·No. No. 2D02-3831·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Jackson appeals a judgment for burglary of a dwelling, opposing an officer without violence, and petit theft. We affirm the judgment without further comment. As the State concedes, however, the face of the judgment contains a scrivener’s error. The judgment indicates that Mr. Jackson was adjudicated guilty of petit theft as a first-degree misdemeanor. See § 812.014(1), (2)(e), Fla. Stat. (2001). In fact, Jackson was adjudicated guilty of pet-it theft as a second-degree misdemeanor. See § 812.014(1), (3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001).

We remand the judgment for the circuit court to correct this error.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 870 So. 2d 135, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19785, 2003 WL 23094600 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

870 So. 2d 135 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bourne v. State
869 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Milin v. Northwest Florida Land, LC
870 So. 2d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)