Jackson v. State

916 So. 2d 37, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19595, 2005 WL 3299345
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 833 So. 2d 243
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 2005·No. No. 4D05-3505·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final order of the Martin County Circuit Court, summarily denying Calvin Jackson’s rule 3.850 motion for post conviction relief. We affirm without prejudice to Jackson’s right to file a rule 3.800(a) motion raising his [38]*38Hale1 challenge if he can demonstrate in that motion that he is entitled to relief without the need for an evidentiary hearing and that entitlement is clear on the face of the record. See Jones v. State, 894 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Nelson v. State, 855 So.2d 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

STEVENSON, C.J., KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 916 So. 2d 37, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19595, 2005 WL 3299345 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

916 So. 2d 37 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hale v. State
630 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Nelson v. State
855 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Jones v. State
894 So. 2d 1070 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)