Jackson v. State

829 So. 2d 398, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16088, 2002 WL 31466472
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6177
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 2002·No. No. 3D02-2481·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Douglas M. Jackson seeks certiorari review of a state trial court memorandum declining to file his complaint in the Eleventh Circuit Court for Dade County. In his petition for certiorari, Jackson contended, among other things, that his civil rights under federal law, 42 U.S.C.1983, had been violated when the Florida Department of Corrections failed to send his personal property along with him when he was transferred to another facility. Jackson correctly points out that the state courts have concurrent jurisdiction with federal courts to enforce federal cases arising under federal law where not specifically prohibited by Congress. However, we must agree with the trial court that Jackson should file for rehearing in federal court as the matters he raised in the state court petition essentially and directly continue his Emergency Motion for Court Ordered Return of Legal, Religious, and Personal Property Confiscated, filed June 12, 2002, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 01-460 Civ Jordan. We therefore deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 829 So. 2d 398, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16088, 2002 WL 31466472 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

829 So. 2d 398 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.