Jackson v. State

755 So. 2d 814, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4563, 2000 WL 390184
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 698 So. 2d 1299
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 2000·No. No. 3D00-0549·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie James Jackson appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

First, appellant contends that he should not have been adjudicated a violent habitual offender. Appellant has shown no legally sufficient basis for challenging that adjudication and we affirm the trial court’s order denying relief on that point. See Tillman v. State, 609 So.2d 1295, 1296-98 (Fla.1992).

Appellant also contends that he is not being given appropriate gain time by the Department of Corrections. We likewise affirm the denial of relief, without prejudice to the appellant to exhaust his administrative remedies within the Department of Corrections.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 755 So. 2d 814, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4563, 2000 WL 390184 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

755 So. 2d 814 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tillman v. State
609 So. 2d 1295 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)