Jackson v. State

598 So. 2d 303, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5951, 1992 WL 104644
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 1992·No. No. 91-1061·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We reverse Jackson’s convictions because, over objection, an investigating police officer was permitted to recount that defendant had “an arrest record and was recently released from prison.” See McGuire v. State, 584 So.2d 89 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); McCall v. State, 463 So.2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Houston v. State, 360 So.2d 468 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Perkins v. State, 349 So.2d 776 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). The other evidence of guilt consisted entirely of non-conclusive eyewitness identification so we cannot say that the error was harmless, State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), and a new trial is therefore required.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 598 So. 2d 303, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5951, 1992 WL 104644 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

598 So. 2d 303 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JEFFREY A HELMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
271 So. 3d 1030 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Willis v. State
669 So. 2d 1090 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Witherspoon v. State
645 So. 2d 146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)