McGuire v. State

584 So. 2d 89, 1991 WL 134864
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 25, 1991
Docket90-1660
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 584 So. 2d 89 (McGuire v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McGuire v. State, 584 So. 2d 89, 1991 WL 134864 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

584 So.2d 89 (1991)

Raymond Jeffrey McGuire, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 90-1660.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

July 25, 1991.
Rehearing Denied September 5, 1991.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David S. Morgan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Raymond Jeffrey McGuire timely appeals his conviction for first degree murder, attempted first degree murder with a firearm, and robbery with a firearm. The only issue on appeal is whether defendant was entitled to a mistrial because, during cross-examination, a witness for the state blurted out that the defendant had been "doing time in Georgia" and that "he was on a fifteen year sentence up in Georgia." The Georgia conviction was unrelated to the current charges.

We agree that the admission of this testimony was reversible error. § 90.404(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1990). Here, even though the trial judge denied the motion for mistrial, he found a curative instruction would not have alleviated the harm done by the comment. The error was not invited by defense counsel, as the state argues. Cf. Ferguson v. State, 417 So.2d 639 (Fla. 1982). As the result of the clear conflict in testimony of the witnesses present, we find there exists at least a "reasonable possibility" that the impermissible statement made by the witness improperly influenced the jury's verdict. See Ward v. State, 559 So.2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

*90 REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial.

GOSHORN, C.J., and PETERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goforth v. State
15 So. 3d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Jackson v. State
598 So. 2d 303 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
584 So. 2d 89, 1991 WL 134864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcguire-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.