Jackson v. State

543 So. 2d 416, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1233, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2771, 1989 WL 51208
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 1989·No. No. 88-213·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The appellant, John T. Jackson, was convicted of second degree murder, manslaughter by culpable negligence, and accessory after the fact to murder or manslaughter. These convictions are based upon the killing of a man named Christopher Stamey by Jackson and one Scott McLeroy.

Initially, we observe that Jackson cannot be convicted of killing Stamey twice. See Houser v. State, 474 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1985). When one conviction must fail, it should be the lesser. See State v. Barton, 523 So.2d 152 (Fla.1988). Moreover, it is legally impossible to be both a principal and an accessory to the same crime. Staten v. State, 519 So.2d 622 (Fla.1988). Therefore, the manslaughter and accessory convictions must be reversed.

We find the admission of hearsay statements accredited to a nontestifying code-fendant not to be reversible error under the facts of this case. See Schneble v. Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 92 S.Ct. 1056, 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972).

Accordingly, we affirm Jackson’s conviction for second degree murder, reverse his convictions for manslaughter and accessory after the fact, and remand for resentenc-ing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 543 So. 2d 416, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1233, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2771, 1989 WL 51208 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

543 So. 2d 416 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowen v. State
791 So. 2d 44 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Williams v. State
601 So. 2d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)