Jackson v. State

220 S.W.2d 800, 215 Ark. 420, 1949 Ark. LEXIS 760
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 30, 1949
Docket4561
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 220 S.W.2d 800 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. State, 220 S.W.2d 800, 215 Ark. 420, 1949 Ark. LEXIS 760 (Ark. 1949).

Opinion

George Rose Smith, J.

Appellant was indicted for

burglary and grand larceny and appeals from a judgment sentencing liim to imprisonment for ten years. I)odd Teague, an accomplice in the commission of tlie crimes, had pleaded guilty to a separate indictment charging him with the same offenses. The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict, but the State was permitted to introduce the record of Teague’s plea of guilty. We passed upon the same question in Hammond v. State, 373 Ark. 674, 293 S.W. 714, and held that the admission of such evidence constitutes prejudicial error. ,The judgment must therefore be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hays v. State
597 S.W.2d 821 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1980)
People v. Crawl
257 N.W.2d 86 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1977)
People v. Marra
183 N.W.2d 418 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1970)
State v. Jackson
155 S.E.2d 236 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
Evans v. State
105 So. 2d 831 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)
Jackson v. State
225 S.W.2d 522 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 S.W.2d 800, 215 Ark. 420, 1949 Ark. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-ark-1949.