Jackson v. Singletary

695 So. 2d 494, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6253, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1436
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 11, 1997·No. No. 96-2286·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon our conclusion that, in the circumstances of his ease, the appellant Jackson became entitled to administrative gain time under section 944.276, Florida Statutes (1987)(repealed by eh. 88-122, § 6, at 527, 537, Laws of Fla.) and provisional credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988)(repealed by ch. 93-406, § 32, at 2911, 2966, Laws of Fla.), the order below denying mandamus is reversed1 because he was unlawfully deprived of those benefits by the enactment of section 944.278, Florida Statutes (1993). Lynce v. Mathis, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997); see also Orosz v. Singletary, 693 So.2d 538 (Fla.1997). The cause is remanded for determination of the precise amount of time to which he is entitled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Singletary, 695 So. 2d 494, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6253, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1436 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

695 So. 2d 494 (Jackson v. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donovan v. Moore
755 So. 2d 613 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
State v. Lancaster
731 So. 2d 1227 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)