Jackson v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jackson v. Singletary

695 So. 2d 494, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6253, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1436

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 1997

DocketNo. 96-2286

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 695 So. 2d 494 (Jackson v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Singletary, 695 So. 2d 494, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6253, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1436 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon our conclusion that, in the circumstances of his ease, the appellant Jackson became entitled to administrative gain time under section 944.276, Florida Statutes (1987)(repealed by eh. 88-122, § 6, at 527, 537, Laws of Fla.) and provisional credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988)(repealed by ch. 93-406, § 32, at 2911, 2966, Laws of Fla.), the order below denying mandamus is reversed¹ because he was unlawfully deprived of those benefits by the enactment of section 944.278, Florida Statutes (1993). Lynce v. Mathis, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997); see also Orosz v. Singletary, 693 So.2d 538 (Fla.1997). The cause is remanded for determination of the precise amount of time to which he is entitled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon our conclusion that, in the circumstances of his ease, the appellant Jackson became entitled to administrative gain time under section 944.276, Florida Statutes (1987)(repealed by eh. 88-122, § 6, at 527, 537, Laws of Fla.) and provisional credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988)(repealed by ch. 93-406, § 32, at 2911, 2966, Laws of Fla.), the order below denying mandamus is reversed¹ because he was unlawfully deprived of those benefits by the enactment of section 944.278, Florida Statutes (1993). Lynce v. Mathis, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997); see also Orosz v. Singletary, 693 So.2d 538 (Fla.1997). The cause is remanded for determination of the precise amount of time to which he is entitled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

695 So. 2d 494, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6253, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack