Jackson v. Ross

342 S.W.3d 442, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 803, 2011 WL 2330852
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 2011·No. ED 95307·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, homebuyers Douglas and Cary Jackson, appeal the judgment en *443 tered by the Circuit Court of St. Charles County against them and in favor of the defendants, sellers John Ross and Janet Tursi, and home inspector Regional Home Inspection Company. 1 We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and find no error.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

1

. Janet Tursi had filed a cross-claim against John Ross for indemnity, but the trial transcript confirms that she abandoned this cross-claim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Ross, 342 S.W.3d 442, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 803, 2011 WL 2330852 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

342 S.W.3d 442 (Jackson v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glastetter v. CITY OF CHAFFEE
342 S.W.3d 442 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)