Jackson v. Ross

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jackson v. Ross

342 S.W.3d 442, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 803, 2011 WL 2330852

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 14, 2011

DocketED 95307

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 S.W.3d 442 (Jackson v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Ross, 342 S.W.3d 442, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 803, 2011 WL 2330852 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, homebuyers Douglas and Cary Jackson, appeal the judgment en *443 tered by the Circuit Court of St. Charles County against them and in favor of the defendants, sellers John Ross and Janet Tursi, and home inspector Regional Home Inspection Company. 1 We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and find no error.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

1

. Janet Tursi had filed a cross-claim against John Ross for indemnity, but the trial transcript confirms that she abandoned this cross-claim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI