Glastetter v. CITY OF CHAFFEE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Glastetter v. CITY OF CHAFFEE

342 S.W.3d 442, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 825, 2011 WL 2329977

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 14, 2011

DocketED 95277

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 S.W.3d 442 (Glastetter v. CITY OF CHAFFEE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glastetter v. CITY OF CHAFFEE, 342 S.W.3d 442, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 825, 2011 WL 2329977 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Leslie Glastetter, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Union Electric Company. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Leslie Glastetter, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Union Electric Company. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 S.W.3d 442, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 825, 2011 WL 2329977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glastetter-v-city-of-chaffee-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack