Jackson v. Poplin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6441
SAMUEL R. JACKSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
H. POPLIN, Programmer, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; S. HOVERMALE, Kitchen Supervisor, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; SGT. R. NICHOLSON; SGT. D. LENTZ,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00107-GCM)
Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Samuel R. Jackson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to
state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Jackson v. Poplin, No. 3:10-cv-00107-GCM (W.D.N.C.
Mar. 12, 2010). We also deny Jackson’s pending motions to
appoint counsel and to amend his complaint. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. Poplin (Jackson v. Poplin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.