Jackson v. Poplin

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2010·No. 10-6441·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6441

SAMUEL R. JACKSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

H. POPLIN, Programmer, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; S. HOVERMALE, Kitchen Supervisor, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; SGT. R. NICHOLSON; SGT. D. LENTZ,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00107-GCM)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel R. Jackson appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to

state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Jackson v. Poplin, No. 3:10-cv-00107-GCM (W.D.N.C.

Mar. 12, 2010). We also deny Jackson’s pending motions to

appoint counsel and to amend his complaint. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Poplin, (4th Cir. 2010).

Jackson v. Poplin (Jackson v. Poplin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)