Jackson v. Poplin

393 F. App'x 976
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2010·No. No. 10-6441·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel R. Jackson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Poplin, No. 3:10-cv-00107-GCM, 2010 WL 966120 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2010). We [977]*977also deny Jackson’s pending motions to appoint counsel and to amend his complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Poplin, 393 F. App'x 976 (4th Cir. 2010).

393 F. App'x 976 (Jackson v. Poplin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)