Jackson v. Pettiford

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2006·No. 06-6841·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6841

EDDIE THOMAS JACKSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

M. PETTIFORD, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:05-cv-02429-MBS)

Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 28, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Thomas Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Eddie Thomas Jackson, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s judgment accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Jackson v. Pettiford, No. 8:05-cv-2429-MBS

(D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Pettiford, (4th Cir. 2006).

Jackson v. Pettiford (Jackson v. Pettiford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241