Jackson v. Pettiford
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6841
EDDIE THOMAS JACKSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
M. PETTIFORD, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:05-cv-02429-MBS)
Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 28, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Thomas Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Eddie Thomas Jackson, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s judgment accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Jackson v. Pettiford, No. 8:05-cv-2429-MBS
(D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. Pettiford (Jackson v. Pettiford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.