Jackson v. Pettiford
Opinion
Eddie Thomas Jackson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jackson v. Pettiford, No. 8:05-cv-2429-MBS (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
192 F. App'x 225 (Jackson v. Pettiford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.