Jackson v. Lillard

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

RONALD JERMAINE JACKSON,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 25-CV-01865-SPM

THOMAS LILLARD,

Respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McGLYNN, District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Ronald Jermaine Jackson’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 October 6, 2025 (Doc. 1). Jackson’s claims have been repeatedly rejected as frivolous by every judge in this District. See Jackson v. Lillard, No. 25-cv-01633-NJR (S.D. Ill. Oct. 2, 2025); Jackson v. Lillard, No. 25-cv-01632-JPG (S.D. Ill. Oct. 1, 2025); Jackson v. Lillard, No. 25-cv-01816-SPM (S.D. Ill. Sept. 23, 2025); Jackson v. Lillard, No. 25-cv-01534- JPG (S.D. Ill. Sept. 19. 2025); Jackson v. Lillard, No. 25-cv-01127-NJR (S.D. Ill. July 7, 2025); Jackson v. Lillard, No. 24-cv-02687-NJR (S.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2025); Jackson v. Lillard, No. 25-cv-00542-DWD (S.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2025); Jackson v. Lillard, No. 24-cv- 01690-NJR (S.D. Ill. Oct. 24, 2024); Jackson v. Lillard, No. 24-cv-01539-JPG (S.D. Ill. June 21, 2024); Jackson v. Lillard, No. 24-cv-1225-SMY (S.D. Ill. June 4, 2024). Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel warned Jackson that, as a sanction, future repetitive habeas corpus petitions will be deemed rejected, without the need for judicial action, 30 days after the petition is filed unless the court orders otherwise. See Jackson v. Lillard, No. 24-cv-02687-NJR, 2025 WL 1234150, at *3 (S.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2025) (citing Alexander v. United States, 121 F.3d 312, 315 (7th Cir. 1997)). The Court has reviewed Jackson’s instant Petition and has determined that it raises no new arguments. Thus, consistent with Chief Judge Rosenstengel’s prior

admonition, Jackson’s Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case on the Court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 7, 2025

s/ Stephen P. McGlynn STEPHEN P. McGLYNN U.S. District Judge