Jackson v. Lillard
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
RONALD JERMAINE JACKSON, No. 22096-041,
Petitioner, Case No. 25-cv-1632-JPG v.
T. LILLARD,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on petitioner Ronald Jermaine Jackson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed August25, 2025 (Doc. 1). Jackson’s claims have been repeatedly rejected as frivolous by courts in this district. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel has warned Jackson that, as a sanction, future repetitive habeas corpus petitions will be deemed rejected, without the need for judicial action, 30 days after the petition is filed unless the court orders otherwise. Jackson v. Lillard, No. 24-cv-2687-NJR, 2025 WL 1234150, at *3 (S.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2025) (citing Alexander v. United States, 121 F.3d 312, 315 (7th Cir. 1997)). The Court has reviewed Jackson’s instant petition and has determined that it raises no argument cognizable in a § 2241 petition. Thus, consistent with the Court’s prior admonition, the Court DENIES Jackson’s instant petition (Doc. 1) and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 1, 2025
s/ J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. Lillard (Jackson v. Lillard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.