Jackson v. Lee
This text of 96 A.D.2d 760 (Jackson v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Monroe County Family Court for an immediate hearing before another Judge. Memorandum: The court erred in proceeding to trial in this custody matter over respondent’s attorney’s objection and in respondent’s absence. Inasmuch as this hearing involved the health, safety and welfare of a young child, it was an abuse of discretion not to grant a reasonable continuance (Matter of Tanya G., 79 AD2d 881; see CPLR 4402). Moreover, the attorney’s excusable unpreparedness deprived respondent of the meaningful representation to which she is entitled (Matter of Ella B., 30 NY2d 352; Matter of Shalom S., 88 AD2d 936). Petitioner’s witnesses were not cross-examined, and the record lacks information critical to a proper custody determination. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Bonadio, J. — custody.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and Boomer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 A.D.2d 760, 465 N.Y.S.2d 314, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-lee-nyappdiv-1983.