In re Shalom S. Queensboro Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Shalom S. Queensboro Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Inc.

88 A.D.2d 936, 451 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17285

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 88 A.D.2d 936 (In re Shalom S. Queensboro Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shalom S. Queensboro Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Inc., 88 A.D.2d 936, 451 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17285 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a child abuse proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.), dated June 9, 1981, which, after a hearing, determined that the child was an abused child, and directed that she be placed [937]*937with the Commissioner of Social Services for a period not to exceed 18 months. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court for a new hearing in accordance herewith. The unjustified refusal of the Family Court to grant the appellants a second brief adjournment so that their counsel might be present at the hearing deprived them of any meaningful exercise of their right to an attorney (see Matter of Ella B., 30 NY2d 352). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Gulotta and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a child abuse proceeding, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.), dated June 9, 1981, which, after a hearing, determined that the child was an abused child, and directed that she be placed [937]*937with the Commissioner of Social Services for a period not to exceed 18 months. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court for a new hearing in accordance herewith. The unjustified refusal of the Family Court to grant the appellants a second brief adjournment so that their counsel might be present at the hearing deprived them of any meaningful exercise of their right to an attorney (see Matter of Ella B., 30 NY2d 352). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Gulotta and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 936, 451 N.Y.S.2d 165, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shalom-s-queensboro-society-for-prevention-of-cruelty-to-children-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack