Jackson v. Haydu

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2078

ALPHONSO JACKSON, Acting Secretary of Housing and Urban Development,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GEORGE HAYDU,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

BUYERS SOURCE SUGARMILL, L.L.C.; BUYERS SOURCE SAVANNAH, L.L.C.; BUYERS SOURCE VALLEY GROUP, L.L.C.; ISLAND REALTY, L.L.C.; BSMC, INCORPORATED; BELMONT PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; ONE SOURCE EQUITY, L.L.C.; FREDERICK BLAKE; THOMAS BREWER; LANNY CAMPBELL; SUSAN GARD; HENRY MONTGOMERY; SUSAN SMOTHERS, a/k/a Susan Strothers; JO ANNE BARROS; DARRELL BROOKS; PATRICK CAMPBELL; MIKE DURHAM; BILL ELKO; LEON LUCARELLI, a/k/a Leon Masterson; BEVERLY MCPHERSON; DAWN MOCK; CHRIS A. MONTGOMERY; GREGORY SANJURJO; JEFF VOTAW; SANDY WILLIAMS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-03-591-2) Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 15, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Haydu, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Cozad Biddle, Tara Leigh Grove, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

George Haydu appeals the district court’s order imposing

an injunctive sanction and ordering restitution for conduct that

violated the Interstate Land Sales Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1720

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Jackson v. Haydu, No. CA-03-591-2 (E.D. Va. filed

Aug. 3, 2004 & entered Aug. 4, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -