Jackson v. Haydu

Fourth Circuit

Jackson v. Haydu

126 F. App'x 113

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 15, 2005·No. No. 04-2078·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George Haydu appeals the district court’s order imposing an injunctive sanction and ordering restitution for conduct that violated the Interstate Land Sales Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1720 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jackson v. Haydu, No. CA-03-591-2 (E.D.Va. filed Aug. 3, 2004 & entered Aug. 4, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

George Haydu appeals the district court’s order imposing an injunctive sanction and ordering restitution for conduct that violated the Interstate Land Sales Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1720 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jackson v. Haydu, No. CA-03-591-2 (E.D.Va. filed Aug. 3, 2004 & entered Aug. 4, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Jackson v. Haydu, 126 F. App'x 113 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

126 F. App'x 113 (Jackson v. Haydu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related