Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security

696 F. App'x 650
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 2017
Docket17-1787
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 696 F. App'x 650 (Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security, 696 F. App'x 650 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*651 PER CURIAM:

Billy Ray Jackson appeals the magistrate judge’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of Jackson’s claim for disability insurance benefits. * On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jackson’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the magistrate judge’s disposition, Jackson has forfeited appellate review of the magistrate, judge’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to a final disposition by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cherry v. Barnhart
D. Maryland, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 F. App'x 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ca4-2017.