Jackson v. City of Mobile

Alabama Court of Appeals

Jackson v. City of Mobile

30 So. 2d 40, 33 Ala. App. 95

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 1947·No. 1 Div. 538.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

HARWOOD, Judge.

Appealing to the circuit court from his conviction in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Mobile for violation of the anti .lottery ordinance of said city this appellant was again found guilty. From his conviction in the circuit court he filed his appeal to this court.

The record discloses that no errors were assigned in his appeal to this court.

Proceedings for violations of misdemean- or ordinances are quasi criminal, and on appeal are subject to rules governing civil appeals. Therefore in the absence of assignments of error in such cases, of which this is one, no question is presented for review. See 15 Ala.Dig., Municipal Corporations, <§=>642(1), for numerous cases.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARWOOD, Judge.

Appealing to the circuit court from his conviction in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Mobile for violation of the anti .lottery ordinance of said city this appellant was again found guilty. From his conviction in the circuit court he filed his appeal to this court.

The record discloses that no errors were assigned in his appeal to this court.

Proceedings for violations of misdemean- or ordinances are quasi criminal, and on appeal are subject to rules governing civil appeals. Therefore in the absence of assignments of error in such cases, of which this is one, no question is presented for review. See 15 Ala.Dig., Municipal Corporations, <§=>642(1), for numerous cases.

Affirmed.

Jackson v. City of Mobile, 30 So. 2d 40, 33 Ala. App. 95 (Ala. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

30 So. 2d 40 (Jackson v. City of Mobile) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related