Ellis v. City of Sylacauga

63 So. 2d 33, 36 Ala. App. 687, 1953 Ala. App. LEXIS 313
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 27, 1953
Docket7 Div. 228
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 63 So. 2d 33 (Ellis v. City of Sylacauga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ellis v. City of Sylacauga, 63 So. 2d 33, 36 Ala. App. 687, 1953 Ala. App. LEXIS 313 (Ala. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

HARWOOD, Judge.

Appealing to the circuit court from his conviction in the Recorder’s Court of the [688]*688City of Sylácauga for a violation of an ordinance of said city, this appellant was again found guilty.' From the judgment of guilty iri.the circuit court appellant filed his appeal to .this court.

■ The record discloses that no errors were assigned in his appeal filed in this court.

Proceedings for violation of misdemeanor ordinances are quasi criminal, and on appeal are subject to rules governing civil appeals. In such cases, on appeal, in the absence of assignments of error, no question is presented' for review. Arnold v. City of Mobile, 33 Ala.App. 94, 30 So.2d 40; Jackson v. City of Mobile, 33 Ala.App. 95, 30 So.2d 40; see further 15 Ala.Dig., Municipal Corporations, 642(1) for innumerable additional citations.

Affirmed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gober v. City of Birmingham
133 So. 2d 697 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1961)
Duncan v. City of Scottsboro
104 So. 2d 447 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 So. 2d 33, 36 Ala. App. 687, 1953 Ala. App. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ellis-v-city-of-sylacauga-alactapp-1953.