Jackson ex dem. Gorman v. Hooker

3 Cow. 15
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1824·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The plaintiff’s attorney must now stipulate, and pay the costs of the Circuit, but the defendant must pay the costs of this motion. Applications to this Court should cer tainly be discountenanced, where we cannot but see that the party mighthave taken the full efiectof his application without coming here. A formal tender of the money or stipulation was not necessary till the defendant had made out his bill of costs. There is no pretence that the offer of the plaintiff’s attorney was not in perfect good faith, and we consider the proceeding on his part as equivalent to a tender,

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson ex dem. Gorman v. Hooker, 3 Cow. 15 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

3 Cow. 15 (Jackson ex dem. Gorman v. Hooker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related