Jackson ex dem. Gorman v. Hooker
This text of 3 Cow. 15 (Jackson ex dem. Gorman v. Hooker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff’s attorney must now stipulate, and pay the costs of the Circuit, but the defendant must pay the costs of this motion. Applications to this Court should cer tainly be discountenanced, where we cannot but see that the party mighthave taken the full efiectof his application without coming here. A formal tender of the money or stipulation was not necessary till the defendant had made out his bill of costs. There is no pretence that the offer of the plaintiff’s attorney was not in perfect good faith, and we consider the proceeding on his part as equivalent to a tender,
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Cow. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-gorman-v-hooker-nysupct-1824.