Jackson ex dem. Gorman v. Hooker

New York Supreme Court

Jackson ex dem. Gorman v. Hooker

1 Cow. 586

DecidedOctober 15, 1823

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cow. 586 (Jackson ex dem. Gorman v. Hooker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson ex dem. Gorman v. Hooker, 1 Cow. 586 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia.

The statute under which this proceeding took place, says nothing about the costs. The plaintiff’s attorney is not, therefore, entitled to any compensation for his services, unless the ease is embraced by the general pro vis? ion in the act regulating fe.es for ^attendance, on examining [588]*588a witness out of Court.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia.

The statute under which this proceeding took place, says nothing about the costs. The plaintiff’s attorney is not, therefore, entitled to any compensation for his services, unless the ease is embraced by the general pro vis? ion in the act regulating fe.es for ^attendance, on examining [588]*588a witness out of Court.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cow. 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-ex-dem-gorman-v-hooker-nysupct-1823.