Jackson ex dem. Gorman v. Hooker

1 Cow. 586

Opinion

Curia.

The statute under which this proceeding took place, says nothing about the costs. The plaintiff’s attorney is not, therefore, entitled to any compensation for his services, unless the ease is embraced by the general pro vis? ion in the act regulating fe.es for ^attendance, on examining a witness out of Court.”

(a) If so, the item is properly taxabl£¡ ^ the final bilL

Motion denied, with costs.

2 R. L. 16.