Jackson Co. v. Gardiner Inv. Co.
200 F. 120, 118 C.C.A. 294, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1811
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson Co. v. Gardiner Inv. Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 F. 113 →
Opinion
We are of the opinion that this court is without jurisdiction to allow the petition for the proposed' amendment, and [121]*121that no reasons are presented which would justify an order remanding the case to the District Court. See Nashua & Lowell R. Corp. v. Boston & L. R. Corp., 61 Fed. 237, 245, 9 C. C. A. 468; Mossberg et al. v. Nutter, 124 Fed. 966, 60 C. C. A. 98; Greene v. United Shoe Machinery Co., 124 Fed. 961, 60 C. C. A. 93; Smith v. Weeks, 53 Fed. 758, 3 C. C. A. 644.
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson Co. v. Gardiner Inv. Co., 200 F. 120, 118 C.C.A. 294, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1811 (1st Cir. 1912).
200 F. 120 (Jackson Co. v. Gardiner Inv. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greene v. United Shoe Machinery Co.
124 F. 961 (First Circuit, 1903)
Mossberg v. Nutter
124 F. 966 (First Circuit, 1903)
Smith v. Weeks
53 F. 758 (First Circuit, 1893)
Nashua & Lowell R. v. Boston & Lowell R.
61 F. 237 (First Circuit, 1894)