Jackson Co. v. Gardiner Inv. Co.

200 F. 120, 118 C.C.A. 294, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1811
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedAugust 15, 1912
DocketNos. 984, 985
StatusPublished

This text of 200 F. 120 (Jackson Co. v. Gardiner Inv. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson Co. v. Gardiner Inv. Co., 200 F. 120, 118 C.C.A. 294, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1811 (1st Cir. 1912).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that this court is without jurisdiction to allow the petition for the proposed' amendment, and [121]*121that no reasons are presented which would justify an order remanding the case to the District Court. See Nashua & Lowell R. Corp. v. Boston & L. R. Corp., 61 Fed. 237, 245, 9 C. C. A. 468; Mossberg et al. v. Nutter, 124 Fed. 966, 60 C. C. A. 98; Greene v. United Shoe Machinery Co., 124 Fed. 961, 60 C. C. A. 93; Smith v. Weeks, 53 Fed. 758, 3 C. C. A. 644.

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greene v. United Shoe Machinery Co.
124 F. 961 (First Circuit, 1903)
Mossberg v. Nutter
124 F. 966 (First Circuit, 1903)
Smith v. Weeks
53 F. 758 (First Circuit, 1893)
Nashua & Lowell R. v. Boston & Lowell R.
61 F. 237 (First Circuit, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 F. 120, 118 C.C.A. 294, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-co-v-gardiner-inv-co-ca1-1912.