Jack Goldtrap, D/B/A Jack's Fruit Company, Not Incorporated v. Doyle Conner, Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, Defendants-Third Party v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., Third Party

529 F.2d 1297
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 1976
Docket75--1010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 529 F.2d 1297 (Jack Goldtrap, D/B/A Jack's Fruit Company, Not Incorporated v. Doyle Conner, Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, Defendants-Third Party v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., Third Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jack Goldtrap, D/B/A Jack's Fruit Company, Not Incorporated v. Doyle Conner, Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, Defendants-Third Party v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., Third Party, 529 F.2d 1297 (3d Cir. 1976).

Opinion

529 F.2d 1297

Jack GOLDTRAP, d/b/a Jack's Fruit Company, not incorporated,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Doyle CONNER, Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of
Florida, et al., Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs
Appellants,
v.
GROWERS MARKETING SERVICE, INC., Third Party Defendant.

No. 75--1010.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

April 7, 1976.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc
Denied May 10, 1976.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Charles R. Scott, Judge.

Robert A. Chastain, Gen. Counsel, State of Fla., Dept. of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Tallahassee, Fla., for Doyle Conner and others.

Britt Whitaker, Tampa, Fla., for Jack Goldtrap.

Robert L. Trohn, Lakeland, Fla., for Growers Marketing Service.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This case, which has been much litigated in the Florida Courts, Growers Marketing Service, Inc. v. Conner, Fla.Dist.Ct.App., 1971, 249 So.2d 486; Jack's Fruit Co. v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., Fla., 1972, 261 So.2d 171, makes its second appearance in this Court, Jack's Fruit Company v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., 5 Cir., 1973, 488 F.2d 493. The arguments conclusively show that the District Court had no jurisdiction in this case and accordingly the judgment entered is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with direction to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.1

VACATED and REMANDED with directions to dismiss.

1

With this decision falls the supersedeas bond given by the appellant as well as any other liabilities imposed by the decree now vacated

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldtrap v. Conner
532 F.2d 186 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 F.2d 1297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jack-goldtrap-dba-jacks-fruit-company-not-incorporated-v-doyle-ca3-1976.