Goldtrap v. Conner

529 F.2d 1297
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1010
StatusPublished

This text of 529 F.2d 1297 (Goldtrap v. Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldtrap v. Conner, 529 F.2d 1297 (5th Cir. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case, which has been much litigated in the Florida Courts, Growers Marketing Service, Inc. v. Conner, Fla.Dist.Ct.App., 1971, 249 So.2d 486; Jack’s Fruit Co. v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., Fla., 1972, 261 So.2d 171, makes its second appearance in this Court, Jack’s Fruit Company v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., 5 Cir., 1973, 488 F.2d 493. The arguments conclusively show that the District Court had no jurisdiction in this case and accordingly the judgment entered is vacated and the case remand[1298]*1298ed to the District Court with direction to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.1

VACATED and REMANDED with directions to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Growers Marketing Service, Inc. v. Conner
249 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Jack's Fruit Co. v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc.
261 So. 2d 171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
529 F.2d 1297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldtrap-v-conner-ca5-1976.