J2F Productions Inc. v. Sarrow
This text of 486 F. App'x 689 (J2F Productions Inc. v. Sarrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
J2F Productions, Inc., contends that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to award it attorneys fees as sanctions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 or the court’s inherent powers. We disagree. The district court found that Sarrow’s attorneys acted neither recklessly nor in bad faith. The record does not support a conclusion that this was clear error. See Cline v. Indus. Maint. Eng’g & Contracting Co., 200 F.3d 1223, 1236 (9th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 F. App'x 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j2f-productions-inc-v-sarrow-ca9-2012.