J. B. Colt Co. v. Gainey

136 So. 698, 102 Fla. 1065
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 1, 1931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Buford, C.J.

— In this case there were pleas of failure of consideration. "Verdict was directed in favor of the defendant on the theory that plaintiff did not meet the burden of proof as is required. Davis v. Leighton, 80 Fla. 594, 86 South. Rep. 564.

Assuming that the burden of proof to meet the plea of failure of consideration was on the plaintiff, there was some evidence to prove valuable consideration for the execution and delivery of the notes constituting the cause of action. This evidence consisted of the notes and proof of delivery and installation of the property for which the notes were given with the written statement by the defendant that the delivery and installation was satisfactory. "Whether this prima facie showing of consideration was overcome by the evidence offered by the defendant or was sufficient to establish consideration without failure thereof was a jury question and it was error for the court to instruct a verdict.

The judgment is reversed.

Reversed.

Whitfiedd, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Brown, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. B. Colt Co. v. Gainey, 136 So. 698, 102 Fla. 1065 (Fla. 1931).

136 So. 698 (J. B. Colt Co. v. Gainey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coquina Ridge Properties v. East West Company
255 So. 2d 279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Towles v. Azar
150 So. 734 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)