City of New Orleans v. Gilly

86 So. 564, 148 La. 9, 1920 La. LEXIS 1660
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 3, 1920
DocketNo. 24292
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 86 So. 564 (City of New Orleans v. Gilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of New Orleans v. Gilly, 86 So. 564, 148 La. 9, 1920 La. LEXIS 1660 (La. 1920).

Opinion

PBOYOSTY, J.

Defendant has appealed from his conviction and sentence in the recorder’s court under paragraph 3 of article 6 of Ordinance No. 5181, Commission Council Series of New Orleans, entitled:

“An ordinance regulating the manner of use on the public streets and thoroughfares of the city of New Orleans of carts, drays, wagons, omnibusses, automobiles, motorcycles and every description of carriage kept for hire or livery purposes, or soliciting or transacting business thereon, or kept for private use, and repealing all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions hereof.”

The said paragraph 3 reads:

“Persons in charge. — There shall not be more than one person or chauffeur in charge of each taxicab or for hire vehicle and he shall at no time be more than ten feet away from bis vehicle.”

Defendant operates a taxicab, and, happening to move away more than 10 feet from where it stood, was arrested by a policeman, and was tried and convicted in the recorder’s court — all this in all seriousness, and in all seriousness he would have been made to pay a fine of $10, or go to jail for 30 days, but for the present appeal. Ordinances must be reasonable (28 Cyc. 368), and said paragraph 3 is unreasonable.

The judgment appealed from is set aside, and the affidavit against defendant is annul[11]*11led, and defendant is ordered to be released from arrest without day. •

MONROE. O. J., and O’NIELL, J., concur in the decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Towles v. Azar
150 So. 734 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
J. B. Colt Co. v. Gainey
136 So. 698 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Valentine v. Hayes
135 So. 538 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Blackshear Manufacturing Co. v. Fralick
102 So. 753 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 So. 564, 148 La. 9, 1920 La. LEXIS 1660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-orleans-v-gilly-la-1920.