Izaguirre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Izaguirre v. State

816 So. 2d 172, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5712, 2002 WL 818001

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 1, 2002

DocketNo. 3D01-941

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 816 So. 2d 172 (Izaguirre v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Izaguirre v. State, 816 So. 2d 172, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5712, 2002 WL 818001 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order revoking probation and the consequent sentence are reversed with directions to dismiss the proceeding because there is no competent non-hearsay evidence of the defendant’s guilt. See Blair v. State, 805 So.2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Frazier v. State, 587 So.2d 660 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Brown v. State, 537 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also Phillips v. State, 816 So.2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order revoking probation and the consequent sentence are reversed with directions to dismiss the proceeding because there is no competent non-hearsay evidence of the defendant’s guilt. See Blair v. State, 805 So.2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Frazier v. State, 587 So.2d 660 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Brown v. State, 537 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also Phillips v. State, 816 So.2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 172, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5712, 2002 WL 818001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/izaguirre-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack