Iwanicki v. State of Pennsylvania
This text of Iwanicki v. State of Pennsylvania (Iwanicki v. State of Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED
uEc1 22m2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FoR THE DISTRICT oF coLUMmA °'e"‘- U'S- D’S*_'*‘=* 31 Ba"k'vr»v=v Courts for the D»strict 01 Columbia
CHRISTOPHER IWANICKI, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, § Defendant. g MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter comes before the court on review of plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the
complaint.
The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers See Haines v. Kerrzer, 404 U.S. 5l9, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. S(a). The purpose of the minimum
standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to
prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the
doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977).
The complaint is so incoherently written that the Court cannot discern a viable claim within this court’s subject matter jurisdiction or a basis for exercising personal jurisdiction over the named defendant or a clear statement showing plaintiff entitlement to relief. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint. An Order consistent with this l\/Iemorandum Opinion is
issued separately.
'1?9<¢--»-»
United§'ate)s District judge DATE:
¢L{'z [12__”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Iwanicki v. State of Pennsylvania, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iwanicki-v-state-of-pennsylvania-dcd-2012.