Ivy v. Dudley
217 N.E.2d 875, 6 Ohio St. 2d 261, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 423, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 379
Opinion
The question presented is whether each of the claimants “quit his work without just cause or has been discharged for just cause in connection with his work,” within the meaning of that provision as found in Section 4141.29 (D)(2)(a), Revised Code. This question is answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in Marcum v. Ohio Match Co., 4 Ohio App. 2d 95.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals in each case is affirmed.
Judgments affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ivy v. Dudley, 217 N.E.2d 875, 6 Ohio St. 2d 261, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 423, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 379 (Ohio 1966).
217 N.E.2d 875 (Ivy v. Dudley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Akron v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.
2015 Ohio 5376 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2015)
Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Dir., Ohio Department of Job & Family Services
878 N.E.2d 647 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Lorain County Auditor v. Ohio Unemployment Compensation Review Commission
113 Ohio St. 3d 124 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Parks v. Employment Security Commission
398 N.W.2d 275 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1986)
Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Oszust
491 N.E.2d 298 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1986)
Salzl v. Gibson Greeting Cards, Inc.
399 N.E.2d 76 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)
May Department Stores Co. v. Board of Review-Ohio Bureau of Employment Services
358 N.E.2d 1389 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1975)
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Employment Security Board of Review
502 P.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1972)
Russell v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation
266 N.E.2d 844 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1971)
Redd v. Texas Employment Commission
431 S.W.2d 16 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Mathieu v. Dudley
226 N.E.2d 763 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1967)
Dowler v. Board of Review
223 N.E.2d 62 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1967)